FA Home  >  UCAP >  Minutes 9/23/03

Undergraduate Curriculum And Policy Committee
Tuesday, September 23, 2003,
3 pm Memorial Library , ML 2042


Approved Minutes


Present:  L. Baures, L. Good, K. Greer, G. Holmes, M. Pomije, L. Reeves.   

1.  The minutes of 9/09/03 were approved. 

2.  UCAP welcomes Georgia Holmes as the representative for the College of Business. 

3.  Final approval was given to proposals #1 and #2.  Please see attached Excel® spreadsheet. 

4.  Tentative approval was given to proposal #4.  Please see attached Excel® spreadsheet. 

5.  Baures carried forward UCAP’s recommendation regarding Cultural Diversity to the Executive Committee.  UCAP members requested that cultural diversity proposals be reviewed by the Cultural Diversity Task Force.  The Executive Committee has requested that UCAP continue to review proposals requesting CD designation.  Since UCAP is comprised of faculty representatives from each college and is embedded in the curricular review process, the Executive Committee believes that UCAP is the logical venue for CD review.  In addition, the Executive Committee noted that the Cultural Diversity Task force is not a standing committee.  Based upon this direction, UCAP members reviewed:
• the criteria for core vs. related status and
• the “new” checklist for CD designation including student learning outcomes and strategies to be used to assess student achievement.
This year CD proposals will include these items which should be self identified by the proposal originator.  UCAP hopes this will establish a baseline to determine core vs. related status, but may review and adjust the requested information.  UCAP members were charged with the task of informing college curriculum committee members about the checklist items for CD proposals. 

6.  Baures reported to UCAP from the Distance Learning task force. 
• A handout outlining a proposal for a new Dean to oversee distance learning as well as extended education was reviewed. 
• Baures discussed the current stance of funding models and differential tuition as well. 
• The email requesting distance learning proposals was discussed at length.  Baures emphasized that the proposals were looking at programs and not “stand alone” courses. 
UCAP members were concerned that this call for proposals implies that a program would be generated without addressing the established curricular process.  Much discussion followed about the curricular needs that on-line courses and programs have.  It was noted that this delivery method does change curriculum even in courses that cover the same content as existing traditional delivery courses. 

From these discussions UCAP members developed the following statement.

“When a course delivery method shifts from campus based to on-line, UCAP views this as a curricular change akin to the changes within traditional delivery such as from lecture only to lab-lecture.  Thus it is UCAP’s belief that courses or programs that are developed for on-line learning need to follow the established curricular review and approval process.”

UCAP awaits greater policy development and more information from the Distance Learning task force about hybrid courses and programs before UCAP develops a formal statement in this area. 

7.  Agenda items for the administrative submeet and confer meeting were requested.  The following items were asked to be placed on the agenda:  cultural diversity, distance learning, and verification of electronic catalog. 

8.  Meeting adjourned at 4:30 pm. 

9.  Next Meeting
The next meeting will occur on Tuesday, September 30th, 2003 in ML 2042.  UCAP representatives will meet at 3:00 to conduct standing business.  At 3:30, administrative members and UCAP will conduct the administrative sub-meet and confer meeting. 


Respectfully submitted,

Marie K. Pomije
UCAP Secretary 2003-2004


Return to the beginning

FA Home  >  UCAP