FA Home  >  Main Meet & Confer  >  Notes — 5/6/04

Faculty Association Meet and Confer
6 May 2004
2:00 p.m., CSU 285
(Faculty Chair)

NOTES


Attendance:
Faculty: Stephen Bohnenblust, chair, Roger Severns, Paul J. Hustoles, recorder, Don Descy, Jim Kapoun, Barbara Keating, Donald Larsson, Gregg Marg, Sonja Meiers, Richard Swanson, Mary Visser
Management: Richard Davenport, Scott Olson, Lori Lamb, Diane Solinger, Dean Trauger, John Winkworth
Guests: Warren Sandmann, Terrence Flaherty, Marcia Danielson, Ernie Grieshaber, Gwen Griffin and Brenda Flannery were present for parts of the meeting

The meeting was called to order by FA President Bohnenblust at 2:07 p.m.

1. Information Items--
a.  Reorder/Additions:  Jumped to 2e (see below).
b.  FA President’s Report:  FA President Bohnenblust:  We were very appreciative of the fact that the Children’s House faculty will retain their status.  Also the Faculty Association has donated $2,500 to CETL.  This is a first for us.  We are going to have a LGBT Coordinator on campus and we were very pleased to hear that.
c.  MSU President’s Report:  President Davenport:  MSU has been in the news a lot lately.  I have asked Human Resources Director Lamb to put together an aggressive plan to give administrators media training.  Regarding the question of censorship (regarding the firing of one employee), that was done without the approval of the immediate supervisor.  I believe there is an attempt to reinstate both employees.  Vice President Trauger:  I have had discussions with Myron Metcalf and Randall Harder.  The Sports Information Director needs to work with them to find out if there was a journalistic conflict.  We have to make sure that when we hire someone new, there won’t be that conflict.  President Davenport:  As long as I am President, we will have no censorship.  I welcome sit-ins, especially when they are well organized.  As for the ROTC sit-in, we want them to follow the rules.  The state bonding issue is a little shaky right now.  There is some brinkmanship going on.  We are hopeful that everything isn’t stalled.  I have been on the phone trying to urge legislators to not block this.  We will find out today or tomorrow.  FA:  Is Metcalf or Harder in a union?  Vice President Trauger:  No, they are students.  President Davenport:  Title IX compliance report - we have notified all of the appropriate offices.  We have been assigned an internal auditor from MnSCU to help us.  I wanted to open our records and see if our student participation numbers are accurate.  An auditor can look back and interview both coaches and students.  We have to be above board and share our information openly.  There was a mistake, that’s for sure, and we are working hard to correct that.  FA:  We can barely keep track of students in our classes so we have some sympathy on this issue.  President Davenport:  We will strive for consistency.  Vice President Olson:  On drop dates and withdrawals, Interim Vice President Solinger is looking at ways to tighten this up.  MnSCU is also studying these issues.
d.  VPAA’S Report:  Vice President Olson:  Priority funding for the task forces went out.  Stewart Ross has said that the response to the mini-grants has been overwhelming - we have over 60 applications so far.  The last time we met, we were about 6% behind in admissions.  Now we are only at 4% behind, compared to last year.  We are way ahead of two years ago.  We will meet our 2,200-2,300 target.  There could be as many as 60% more students of color this fall.  This is looking very good.  I continue to consult with FA President Bohnenblust and FA Vice President Severns for the Interim Dean of Social and Behavioral Sciences vacancy.  We have about six candidates that have been nominated.  I hope to have an announcement by next week.  FA Vice President Severns:  How about the Extended Learning Dean position?  Vice President Olson:  We have a verbal acceptance; the contract went out on Tuesday.  We should have that very soon.  We got our top choice for our Graduate Dean and for our Extended Learning Dean.

2. Discussion Items--
a.  MnSCU/Legislative Relations:  No report.
b.  Budget:  Vice President Trauger:  On Monday, President Davenport and I were in St. Paul to discuss the allocation model.  There were a number of proposals that were put forth.  After eight years and thousands of dollars to work on this, there were three new proposals that just popped out.  One challenge is always what year to pick as the base year.  For example, with 1997 (paper distributed), it looks like the state universities are the winners.  There are also problems with Metro and out-state colleges.  Metro institutions have grown significantly in the last few years.  Where this will end up I don’t know.  President Davenport:  This is going back to the TAC committee that works on this.  Vice President Trauger:  I’m not sure if the IFO is involved at the state level.  FA President Bohnenblust:  Yes, we have been.  We are very concerned about this and we are also concerned with what we call “mission creep,” as the two-year colleges do more and more of what the four years have traditionally done.  Vice President Trauger:  In 1999 we lobbied very hard to get a special appropriation because of our historic underfunding.  If you plug that in, then our numbers would be quite a bit higher.  We receive below the MnSCU average for FTE students.  The state universities are still well below our peer institutions if we look outside of MnSCU.  FA President Bohnenblust:  We will continue to keep the pressure on.  President Davenport:  One recommendation that came forth was to separate the budgets and not put us into the average allocation model.  The current model is very difficult to track.  That suggestion came up twice.  The other thing is that if you look at the community metro colleges much of their infrastructure comes out of the system office, and therefore the faculty per FTE is deflated and totally accurate.
c.  Recurring Items (if needed):  None.
1.  Administrative searches:  Human Resources Director Lamb:  We hope to have an announcement by next week for the Director of Research and Sponsored Programs.  There is on-going concern about finding the right person for Director of the Career Development Center.
2.  Higher Learning Commission:  Don Larsson:  The Higher Learning Commission Task Force had its final meeting of the year last week.  Our actual campus visit dates have been set as 6-8 February 2006.  That means that next year will be the easy year for us.  Our new administrative co-chair is Dean Joan Roca.  During the summer, we will be drafting a self-study plan so that we can launch our activities in the fall.  We’ll want to kick off a massive public relations campaign for the campus and the steering committee will be gathering information in the five criteria areas.  I want to thank Vice President Olson and Assistant Vice President Sandmann for their continued support.  Vice President Olson:  And thanks to Don Larsson for his leadership.
d.  Course Equivalency Process:  Assistant Vice President Sandmann passed around a series of proposals that have already been discussed in UCAP.  There are three major issues.  Issue #1:  Once a course comes in as a transfer course, the content department determines whether it is an equivalent course.  If it isn’t a match, the student has to get a substitution/waiver form.  However, once that decision is made, it will go into an equivalency guide and other students will not have to fill out a form.  All subsequent requests will be covered.  FA:  Does this happen forever?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  It will be reviewed every year.  FA Vice President Severns:  The only thing that concerns me is, what happens if the sending institution changes curricula?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  That’s why we would review these each year.  FA Vice President Severns:  Will we actually look at a course outline from the sending institution?  FA Secretary Hustoles:  Can we do this as non-precedent setting?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  You can change waivers.  FA Secretary Hustoles:  So we would use the waiver section rather than the substitution section?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  Yes.  FA President Bohnenblust:  UCAP has approved this?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  This has been approved.  Vice President Olson:  We have had a real challenge with transfer students.  If we have something that is standardized, it would be more helpful.  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  This will be fed into the DARS system.  Issue #2:  The Registrar’s Office wants to get out of the business of determining equivalency.  Issue #3:  The Registrar’s Office wants to move away from paper substitution/waiver forms and do this on-line.  They will start piloting this in the fall.  FA:  What about “writing intensive” equivalencies?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  That would be up to the Gen Ed Committee.  FA:  The English Department cannot be the determiner of whether something is writing intensive or not.  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  We don’t substitute too many classes for this because there is no way for us to determine the writing component.
e.  Mentoring Proposal:  FA President Bohnenblust:  This proposal has been through the FA Executive Committee.  It looks like this is good to go in the fall.  The only issue is, are you comfortable with that $24,000 budget?  Vice President Olson:  There was some concern about Library representation.  FA President Bohnenblust:  We did discuss this and there was no exclusion of Library faculty.  So we are good to get this started?  Vice President Olson:  Correct.
f.  Policy Review:  FA President Bohnenblust:  We are concerned with the Workplace Environment Policy.  We want to act civilly towards each other, but language alone might not lead to discipline.  We would like to rework this policy to separate those things that would require discipline vs. those that are not punishable.  We don’t want to censor.  Human Resources Director Lamb:  If you have some specifics, we could bring that back to the committee, which includes faculty members.  FA:  I talked to several administrators and asked them the same questions, but you gave different answers.  That’s all right but this is a broader issue than we might think.  FA President Bohnenblust:  We don’t want to interfere with freedom of speech.  Human Resources Director Lamb:  But we want to make sure that people can get their work done.  FA VP Severns: There is more work to be done on this.  Human Resources Director Lamb:  I would prefer that we work on this soon, so that we can get this going in the fall.  President Davenport:  There is a lot to be gained to get this in place.  I give an immense amount of credit to the IFO in helping us work together.  There are so many issues that we have resolved internally.  Let’s take care of our issues in a fair and just manner.  Human Resources Director Lamb:  We can work during the summer and bring this back to Meet and Confer in the fall.
g.  Campus Demonstrations:  FA President Bohnenblust:  We are concerned about the potential for more demonstrations and recognizing the long-term issues for students being arrested.  Assistant Vice President Solinger:  Recently we have had a couple of demonstrations.  Two weeks ago we had six individuals who came to ROTC for a sit-in.  They had not gone through the policies.  Human Resources got an e-mail asking what to do.  It was recommended that they call Security.  Security arrived and explained to the demonstrators the policy regarding a protest or demonstration.  We have a designated area for demonstrations.  There can be an exception.  The students basically cut the officer off.  They were told if they didn’t disperse that Mankato Public Safety would be called.  Four decided to leave; two decided to stay and were arrested.  One was a student; one was not.  Last week, the GLBT group went to get the form, asked for an exception and got it.  They protested up on the third floor.  It was very civil and we had a good discussion.  Last year we had a group that was concerned about a visiting team’s mascot.  Security accommodated them.  At St. Cloud there was an altercation.  FA President Bohnenblust:  The gist of our concern is that the police be called in only when it is absolutely necessary.  FA:  Wouldn’t it have been better not to call the police?  Couldn’t we have just talked to them?  We now have a student with an arrest record.  Interim Vice President Solinger:  We didn’t move too quickly.  President Davenport:  I would just say that the academy is one of the last places where everyone can make their voices heard.  I don’t think in any way do we want to weaken that position.  Anything that will limit a student's right to speak out is going to be questioned.  But I do think there needs to be some rules of engagement.  There are times where we can cajole students.  There are ways you can talk them out of being arrested.  Sometimes they want to be arrested.  FA Vice President Severns:  We had a discussion in our Executive Meeting.  As we get closer to the election, there might be more demonstrations.  It may behoove us to make sure that next year’s class is very aware of the policy.  President Davenport:  We do have ROTC on this campus and it is a department.  We need to be considerate of the role they play on our campus, even if we don’t agree with government policies.  Interim Vice President Solinger:  They weren’t protesting ROTC, they were protesting the war in Iraq.  Human Resources Director Lamb:  We also have to give our employees a safe place to work.  I got a question:  “What about employee rights?”
h.  Task Force/Committee Reports  None.
1.  Graduate Education:  Dean Flaherty (passed out a status report):  We feel we have made significant progress.  Objective 1 has been addressed.  Objective 2 and 6:  We are looking at programs that are no longer viable.  Thirteen have been (or will be) closed within the past two years.  Objective 4 has also made progress.  We are hoping to be a paperless office by the end of next year.  Check http://www2.mnsu.edu/grauduate/gradedtaskforce/index.htm for full information.
2.  Distance Learning:  Dean Flaherty (passed out a status report):  Check
http://www2.mnsu.edu/grauduate/dltf/index.htm for full information.  Again, we are making good progress.  Closure for accreditation should be in September.  A major task will be an enrollment management document for next fall.  We have given some funds to nine on-line programs and they have all exceeded in our expectations.  One of the things we realized right away is that we needed to provide more development opportunities.  Another group has worked on intellectual property and we expect closure this fall.  Students and faculty support services have taken a lot more time than we expected, but we will have something in place by the fall.  Sustainable funding has been achieved.  Finally, we recommend that we stay together through December to assist the new dean.  FA:  We have read that as many as half of the number of students who start an on-line course don’t finish it.  Are you going to watch for this?  Dean Flaherty:  There is much literature on this.  First we are going to make sure that the students are really ready for on-line sources.  President Davenport:  I understood that MnSCU put forth a blanket proposal for approval for accreditation.  Dean Flaherty:  They are the proxy, we are in the queue.  President Davenport:  Was there a discussion of a new College of Extended Learning?  Dean Flaherty:  We did not discuss this.
3.  Undergraduate Excellence:  Assistant Vice President Sandmann (passed out a status report):  We got a later start than all of the other task forces.  Check
http://www.mnsu.edu/acadaf/pdfs/EUAENotes/EUAEPrelimReport.pdf for full information.  It is there for everyone to review our preliminary report and we ask for your feedback.  There are four subgroups:  Academic Standards; Climate of Academic Excellence; General Education; and Majors and Minors.  We hope to have a final report by the end of the fall semester.  We also received some of the strategic funding money and we have already awarded mini-grants.  President Davenport:  Is there discussion about addressing rigor in the classroom?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  Yes, that is included in Academic Standards.
4.  Marketing:  Marsha Danielson:  We started with research and we have found that we don’t have a very defined brand.  We really tried to articulate what our brand is, defining who we are.  We looked at taking the Modern University concept and then came up with several key concepts.  We did an internal test launch of these.  We heard that we were close, but not there.  We need to talk more about the personalized attention that faculty give to students.  We then tried to lay this over the value statements, and we put out a survey to all faculty and staff last week.  We have over a 20% response rate so far.  We don’t have it all tabulated yet, but the one thing that came through very clear is that personalized service and a dedicated faculty and staff are coming to the forefront.  This will help us to refine the message.  We will advertise in magazines and on billboards.  We are going to take a more proactive approach.  Rather than churn out over 500 press releases for us to be everything to everybody, we will ask more help from the campus to give us more of a focus.  Our new media director will establish relationships with all media.  We will find stories to prove our values.  We will hand these to the media on a platter.  Our identified experts will also help with this.  We are going to have media training for our key spokespersons.  With our new portal system, we can separate our external and internal audiences.  The Wall of Distinction will be in the new addition in the Student Union.  It will answer the questions about what you do with an MSU degree.  We will make the display so that it can rotate.
5.  International Programs:  Brenda Flannery (report distributed):  We have only been together a short time.  We needed to become a major information gathering group.  International education is all over the place.  We looked at a lot of other universities.  We need to have an International hub, which could serve as one-stop shopping for our students.  We have very few students who now study abroad.  We have 600 International students who pretty much know where to go.  We need one reporting entity.  Vice President Olson:  I didn’t mention before that International student admits are down 25% in one year because of the Patriot Act.  Brenda Flannery:  Students are going to more welcoming countries.  The Task Force would like to have a continuing role to play.  This report was just completed this morning.  President Davenport:  Did you consider having this entity report to Student Affairs?  Brenda Flannery:  We found that in most other schools it reports to Academic Affairs, because these issues are academic issues.  When we looked at Best Practices institutions, we found no examples in Student Affairs.  FA:  A lot of us faculty view International education as defining a modern university.  It is very clear that we are way behind with this.  Brenda Flannery:  Many universities seem to be using these things as a strategic priority.  Vice President Olson:  Harvard is now requiring every student to study abroad.  FA:  Some of us are concerned that students can’t afford this.  More students are working.  We need to work on making study abroad more affordable.  Brenda Flannery:  We need to work with University Advancement in making more funds available.  FA:  Was there any discussion about how this could relate to distance education?  Brenda Flannery:  We did have quite a few conversations about this, but we didn’t want to put this under distance education to make sure that the focus is always on International.  FA Vice President Severns:  I commend the committee for all of their hard work in such a short amount of time.  Regarding affordability, there are programs out there that might be able to be expanded.  FA:  I understand the value of those tour types of things, but we need to look at the full semesters abroad.
6.  Gender Equity:  Ernie Grieshaber (report distributed):  FA President Bohnenblust created this committee because there was a challenge that we discovered in the salary equity committee.  We completed the tasks listed on page one.  Some of the findings?  The success rate for women is the same as men for the past ten years.  There did not seem to be any problem.  Then we looked at individuals who didn’t go up for promotion.  We looked at individuals who were in one rank for ten years or longer.  We identified 79 faculty in that category (42 female, 37 male).  We then sent a survey to all and 37 responded.  We categorized replies under a number of headings:  Improper Standards; Misinformation; Dread of Process; and No Encouragement and Support.  Vice President Olson:  Some of these go back quite a ways.  Some of these individuals have now actually been promoted.  When they say “my Dean,” this could have been a Dean of 25 years ago.  Recommendations of the committee:  1.  Hold regularly scheduled workshops; 2.  Establish a mentoring system; 3.  Organize campus discussion on what fulfills Criterion 2 (scholarly and creative activity) and how these criteria are weighted; and 4.  Encourage the FA to consider the formation of a Promotion and Tenure Committee.  FA:  I am really interested in how these are integrating with other task forces.  We used to have what we called the APT Committee, but we were told by the state IFO office to discontinue it because we could not legally do the kind of peer review found at many institutions.  What we did do was to meet with the Vice President for Academic Affairs and serve as an advocate for the file.  We would clarify.  Vice President Olson:  More of an advocacy than an evaluative role?  FA:  Yes.  But the state IFO told us we were opening ourselves up to lawsuits.  FA:  Earlier, we did play an evaluative role, then it became advocacy.  We were keeping the Vice Presidents honest.  FA Vice President Severns:  On page 14, I noticed that the library had a lot fewer people.  Ernie Grieshaber:  Yes, there were just fewer people to analyze.  If we do more with this data, I would like a clear objective.  Human Resources Director Lamb:  We had a specific question and we answered it.  FA Vice President Severns:  Did any questions come up in working on this?  Human Resources Director Lamb:  If there is more to be done, let us know.  We could not find that there was a gender or minority issue here.  Gwen Griffin:  The most important thing is that we found there is not a problem with gender.  We did find that there is considerable “dread” regarding the whole process.  FA President Bohnenblust:  Thanks to the committee.  We will consider that this committee has completed its task.
i.  Executive Director of University Assessment:  FA President Bohnenblust:  We had a couple of things to discuss.  Duties 1 and 2 seem redundant.  Is this an internal or external search?  Also, we were concerned with the relationship of this position with our Program Review and Assessment Committee.  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  This would be the lead assessment officer who would collaborate with the person in Student Affairs.  The initial person will be an internal candidate (three-year appointment) but, after that, we would hold a national search.  The Program Review and Assessment Committee has approved this and looks forward to working with that person.  FA:  This position would replace Pellet?  Assistant Vice President Sandmann:  Yes.

3. Other Items--
FA President Bohnenblust:  I would like to thank members of the Meet and Confer team.  I thing we have had a very productive year and have made significant progress.  I especially appreciated the speed with which Academic Affairs gets things done.  It’s refreshing to have both speed and quality at the same time.  President Davenport:  I concur.  I think everything has really gone smoothly this year.  We have had open and frank discussions and that is the best way to move forward.  I appreciate how the University has embraced the strategic initiatives.  I have approved a $500,000 fund to put some of these plans into effect.  We have moved forward as a team in the spirit of shared governance.

The meeting ended at 4:11 p.m.


_______________________________    _____________________________       
John M. Winkworth                Paul J. Hustoles
Reviewer for Management            Reviewer for Faculty



Return to the beginning

FA Home
  >  Main Meet & Confer